aisearch.jobs ← All jobs
Jobs / SEO/GEO Director at Jellyfish

SEO/GEO Director

🔥 Posted 57 days ago
🇺🇸 New York, United States On-site Full-time North America $130K – $145K/yr
Apply

About this role

Agency role, not in-house: you're leading SEO/GEO across multiple enterprise clients at once, not owning one brand's strategy. Good fit if you want breadth and client-facing work over deep ownership of a single narrative.

AI Replacement Risk

LOW
Apply

Similar Jobs

Associate Director, Organic Content & Growth (SEO & GEO/AEO)

Posted 53 days ago View role ↗
Cresset · Chicago, IL

Our Take:An unusual sector for this niche: Cresset is a multi-family office and private investment firm building out organic and AEO/GEO capability, worth a look if you want financial services exposure. Associate Director level, listed comp band looked malformed in the scrape so we've left salary blank rather than show a wrong number.

AI Replacement Risk LOW
North America On-site Full-time Lead / Director Financial ServicesAEOGEOSEO

SEO / GEO Manager

Posted 53 days ago View role ↗
HawkSEM · United States ·$80,000.00/yr - $90,000.00/yr

Our Take:HawkSEM is a digital marketing agency (Google, Meta, and Microsoft Ads partner), so this is agency-side work across client accounts. $80K-$90K listed, explicit framing around adapting strategy for Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT.

AI Replacement Risk MED
North America On-site Full-time Manager Advertising Services and Marketing ServicesGEOSEO

SEO/GEO Manager

Posted 54 days ago View role ↗
Reducto · San Francisco, CA

Our Take:Reducto is a genuinely fast-growing AI-native startup (8x revenue growth year over year, works with the likes of Harvey and Scale), so this is a company that lives and breathes the space it's asking you to optimize for. San Francisco.

AI Replacement Risk LOW
North America On-site Full-time Manager Software DevelopmentGEOSEO
How We Score It

AI Replacement Risk, explained

We rate every role on how much of the day-to-day work could plausibly be done by current AI tools within the next year or two. It's a judgment call, not a hard science, based on three questions:

Task repeatability — is the work mostly repeatable execution (drafting, formatting, routine audits), or judgment-heavy (strategy, negotiation, prioritization)?
Precedent — are AI tools already doing a meaningful chunk of this work well today, in production, somewhere?
Accountability — does the role carry a decision or relationship someone has to own, not just an output that has to exist?

LOW

Mostly judgment, negotiation, or ownership work. AI assists, it doesn't replace.

MED

A real mix of judgment and repeatable execution. Expect the repeatable half to keep shrinking.

HIGH

Mostly production or output work, with real AI precedent already in the wild.

This is our own read, not a scientific index. Treat it as a conversation starter before you apply, not a scorecard.